Implementation of TLM

One of the advantages of TLM is that the core algorithm is very straightforward. Each timestep can be divided into two processes:

  1. scatter
  2. connect

During the "scatter" stage, voltage pulses incident on the node are scattered to produce a new set of outgoing voltage pulses. During the "connect" stage, voltage pulses are transferred to the adjacent nodes. It is possible to combine both processes together but it is simpler to consider them separately. Below, typical procedures for 3-dimensional electromagnetic problems are described.


Scatter

Standard 12-port node

The standard 12-port symmetrical condensed node can be used to model loss-less material of constant properties. Using Johns original notation [1], the scattering process can be written as (Fortran style):

    V( 1,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V02 + V03 + V09 - V11 )
    V( 2,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V01 + V06 - V10 + V12 )
    V( 3,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V01 + V04 + V08 - V12 )
    V( 4,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V03 + V05 - V07 + V11 )
    V( 5,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V04 + V06 - V08 + V10 )
    V( 6,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V02 + V05 + V07 - V09 )
    V( 7,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * (-V04 + V06 + V08 + V10 )
    V( 8,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V03 - V05 + V07 + V11 )
    V( 9,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V01 - V06 + V10 + V12 )
    V(10,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * (-V02 + V05 + V07 + V09 )
    V(11,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * (-V01 + V04 + V08 + V12 )
    V(12,X,Y,Z) = 0.5 * ( V02 - V03 + V09 + V11 )

where V01-V12 are temporary quantities used to store the incident pulses. The storage for the incident and reflected pulses can be shared, provided that local storage is used during the scattering procedure to prevent overwriting of incident pulses before they are used.

The number of arithmetic operations can be minimized by using the algorithm developed by Trenkic [2] (C style):

    vdiff = vxpy - vxny;
    vtemp = 0.5 * ( vznx + vzpx + vdiff );
    pt[PYPX] = vtemp;
    pt[PYNX] = vtemp - vdiff;

    vdiff = vxpz - vxnz;
    vtemp = 0.5 * ( vynx + vypx + vdiff );
    pt[PZPX] = vtemp;
    pt[PZNX] = vtemp - vdiff;

    vdiff = vypz - vynz;
    vtemp = 0.5 * ( vxny + vxpy + vdiff );
    pt[PZPY] = vtemp;
    pt[PZNY] = vtemp - vdiff;

    vdiff = vypx - vynx;
    vtemp = 0.5 * ( vzny + vzpy + vdiff );
    pt[PXPY] = vtemp;
    pt[PXNY] = vtemp - vdiff;

    vdiff = vzpx - vznx;
    vtemp = 0.5 * ( vynz + vypz + vdiff );
    pt[PXPZ] = vtemp;
    pt[PXNZ] = vtemp - vdiff;

    vdiff = vzpy - vzny;
    vtemp = 0.5 * ( vxnz + vxpz + vdiff );
    pt[PYPZ] = vtemp;
    pt[PYNZ] = vtemp - vdiff;

This time, we use variables vxny-vzpy to temporarily store the incident pulses. This notation uses three characters to identify the port, the first gives the direction of the link-line, the second is "n" or "p" indicating whether the port is on the negative or positive side of the node (taking the centre as the origin), and the third gives the polarisation of the voltage pulse [3]. The variables vdiff and vtemp are just used as short term storage. The variable pt points to the current node and the constants PXNY-PZPY give the index into the node array for each port.

Stub-loaded node

The stub-loaded node can be used to model lossy materials with properties different from other nodes in the mesh. Three open-circuit stubs are added to model increased permittivity, three short-circuit stubs are added to model increased permeability [1] and matched stubs coupling with either the electric [4] or magnetic fields [5] can be used to model losses. Note that no additional storage is required for the loss stubs since pulses scattered into these stubs are completely absorbed.

The scattering procedure can be written in the following form:

    vx = kvx * ( vynx + vypx + vznx + vzpx + vocx );
    vy = kvy * ( vzny + vzpy + vxny + vxpy + vocy );
    vz = kvz * ( vxnz + vxpz + vynz + vypz + vocz );
    ix = kix * ( vynz - vypz + vzpy - vzny + vscx );
    iy = kiy * ( vznx - vzpx + vxpz - vxnz + vscy );
    iz = kiz * ( vxny - vxpy + vypx - vynx + vscz );

    pt[PXNY] = vy - iz - vxpy;
    pt[PXNZ] = vz + iy - vxpz;
    pt[PXPY] = vy + iz - vxny;
    pt[PXPZ] = vz - iy - vxnz;
    pt[PYNZ] = vz - ix - vypz;
    pt[PYNX] = vx + iz - vypx;
    pt[PYPZ] = vz + ix - vynz;
    pt[PYPX] = vx - iz - vynx;
    pt[PZNX] = vx - iy - vzpx;
    pt[PZNY] = vy + ix - vzpy;
    pt[PZPX] = vx + iy - vznx;
    pt[PZPY] = vy - ix - vzny;

    pt[POCX] = yocx * vx - vocx;
    pt[POCY] = yocy * vy - vocy;
    pt[POCZ] = yocz * vz - vocz;
    pt[PSCX] = zscx * ix - vscx;
    pt[PSCY] = zscy * iy - vscy;
    pt[PSCZ] = zscz * iz - vscz;

Here, variables vocx-vocz represent the pulses on open-circuit stubs of normalised admittance yocx-yocz and vscx-vscz represent the pulses on short-circuit stubs of normalized impedance zscx-zscz. For the open-circuit stubs, it is convenient to store the product of the voltage and the normalised admittance. The constants kvx-kvz and kix-kiz may be evaluated and stored before the calculation proper, and are given by expressions of the form:

    kvx = 2.0 / ( 4.0 + yocx + gx );
    kix = 2.0 / ( 4.0 + zscx + zx );

where gx is the normalised electric loss stub admittance and zx is the normalised magnetic loss stub impedance.

These expressions were originally put into this form by Naylor and Ait-Sadi [6] and it has been found that this is also a computationally efficient formulation [3].

Hybrid and super-condensed nodes

The scattering procedures for hybrid [7] and super-condensed nodes [8] can also be expressed in a similar form but here account has to be taken of the fact the the 12 link-lines no longer have the same impedance.

More detailed discussions on the implementation and efficiency of various scattering procedures are given by Herring [3] [9] and Trenkic [10].


Connect

For the case when the link-line impedances are all equal, the connection stage consists simply of transferring the voltage pulses to the adjacent nodes. For the hybrid and super-condensed nodes, the link-line impedances can be different and an impedance discontinuity will exist. This must be taken into account when transferring the pulses.


References

  1. P. B. Johns, "A symmetrical condensed node for the TLM method", IEEE Trans. MTT, 1987, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp 370-377.
  2. V. Trenkic, C. Christopoulos and T. M. Benson, "New developments in the numerical simulation of RF and microwave circuits using the TLM method", 1st Conference in Modern Satellite and Cable Systems (TELSIKS), Nis, Yugoslavia, Oct. 1993, pp 6.1-6.6.
  3. J. L. Herring and C. Christopoulos, "The application of different meshing techniques to EMC problems", Proc. 9th Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics (ACES), 22-26 March 1993, Monterey, CA, USA, pp 755-762.
  4. P. Naylor and R. A. Desai, "New three dimensional symmetrical condensed lossy node for solution of electromagnetic wave problems by TLM", Electronics Letters, 1990, Vol. 26, pp 492-494.
  5. F. J. German, G. K. Gothard and L. S. Riggs, "Modelling of materials with electric and magnetic losses with the symmetrical condensed TLM method", Electronics Letters, 1990, Vol. 26, pp 1307-1308.
  6. P. Naylor and R. Ait-Sadi, "Simple method for determining 3-D TLM nodal scattering in nonscalar problems", Electronics Letters, 1992, Vol. 28, pp 2353-2354.
  7. R. A. Scaramuzza and A. J. Lowery, "Hybrid symmetrical condensed node for TLM method", Electronics Letters, 1990, Vol. 26, pp 1947-1949.
  8. V. Trenkic, C. Christopoulos and T. M. Benson, "Theory of the symmetrical super-condensed node for the TLM method", IEEE Trans. MTT, 1995, Vol. 43, No. 6.
  9. J. L. Herring and C. Christopoulos, "The use of graded and multigrid techniques in transmission-line modelling", 2nd International Conference on Computation in Electromagnetics, 12-14 April 1994, Nottingham, UK, IEE Conf. Publ. 384, pp 142-145.
  10. V. Trenkic, C. Christopoulos and T. M. Benson, "Efficient computation algorithms for TLM", 1st International TLM Workshop, 1-3 August 1995, Victoria, B. C., Canada, pp 77-80.

J. L. Herring, 25 August 1995.